The Critically Reflective Practitioner – Academic Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Task
Your assignment should be word processed (handwritten assignments are not accepted), using time new roman size 12 font, double spaced, with numbered pages and your student number printed as a footer on every page.The word limits stated for this assignment excludes the reference list at the end of the assignment but includes all text in the main body of the assignment (including direct quotations, in-text citations, footnotes, tables, diagrams and graphs).Appendices are not considered a supplement, and thus, will not be assessed as part of the content of the assignment. As such, they will not contribute to the grade awarded, however it may be appropriate to use an Appendices section for any material which is a useful reference for the reader. Please note that appendices are not included in the word count.The majority of references should come from primary sources (e.g., journal articles, conference papers, reports, etc.) although you can also utilise area specific textbooks. You must ensure that you use the Harvard style of Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria of literature for the review (ensure the validity and reliability of the research studies you included in your review) 20Findings of the literature review What does the literature tell you in relation to the theories and models you need to develop?

Exceptional Pass Exemplary attainment of all learning outcomes

• Demonstrates an outstanding synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area
• Wide-ranging emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline
• Offers an exhaustive exploration of the literature and evidence-base
• The material covered is accurate and relevant
• The argument is highly sophisticated
• The standard of writing is refined
• No errors in the use of the specified referencing system
• Well-presented and organised in an appropriate academic style.
• 80-89 Outstanding Pass Excellent attainment of all learning outcomes, with some met to an exemplary.

Standard

• Demonstrates a comprehensive synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area. Wide-ranging emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline
• Extends far beyond expected levels of engagement with the literature and evidence- base
• The material covered is accurate and relevant
• The argument is generally very astute
• The standard of writing is refined
• No errors in the use of the specified referencing system
• Well-presented and organised in an appropriate academic style.
• 70-79 Excellent pass Excellent attainment of all learning outcomes
• Demonstrates a thorough synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area
• Strong emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline
• Thorough use the literature and evidence-base
• The material covered is accurate and relevant
• The argument is persuasive and there are very perceptive elements
• The standard of writing is refined
• No errors in the use of the specified referencing system

Well-presented and organised in an appropriate academic style.

• 60-69 Good Pass Good attainment of all learning outcomes
• Demonstrates detailed synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area
• Good emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline
• Good consideration of the literature and evidence-base that develops from recommended readings
• The material covered is accurate and relevant
• The argument is persuasive
• The standard of writing is refined
• No errors in the use of the specified referencing system
• Well-presented and organised in an appropriate academic style.
• 50-59 Pass Adequate attainment of all learning outcomes
• Demonstrates a limited, but sufficient, synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area
• Some emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline
• Sufficient consideration of the literature and evidence-base, but little consideration beyond recommended readings
• The material covered is mostly accurate and relevant
• The argument is straightforward and relatively clear
• The standard of writing is well clear and readable, with some sophisticated phrasing
• No errors in the use of the specified referencing system
• Well-presented and organised in an appropriate academic style.
• 40-49 Needs some improvement Meets most, but not all learning outcomes
• Demonstrates limited synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area
• Less than expected emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline
• Basic consideration of the literature and evidence-base, but restricted to recommended readings
• Some inaccuracies or irrelevant materials that suggest confusion and misunderstanding
• The argument is relatively clear, although some elements are difficult to understand